Lil Durk is challenging the credibility of a federal informant whose claims are central to the government’s argument against granting him bond in a murder-for-hire case.
The rapper, born Durk Banks, is asking a judge to release him from jail while he awaits trial on federal charges tied to an alleged plot to kill rival rapper Quando Rondo.
Prosecutors say Lil Durk directed six men to carry out the hit, which ended with the fatal shooting of Saviay’a “Lul Pab” Robinson at a Los Angeles gas station.
But his legal team says the government’s case leans heavily on unverified statements from a paid FBI informant with a criminal background.
“The government repeatedly cites to allegations from a federal case out of Illinois where Mr. Banks has never been charged and never will be charged, despite the passage of over three years since the underlying incident,” attorney Drew Findling revealed. “The government’s own exhibit reveals that the allegations pertaining to Mr. Banks are based primarily on information from a cooperating human source, ‘CHS 1,’ described in the affidavit as a paid FBI informant and former gang member with a criminal history.”
Findling says the government has failed to prove Lil Durk is a danger to the public or a flight risk. They’ve proposed a $4.5 million bond package that includes $3 million in personal funds, $1 million from Alamo Records, $500,000 from a business partner and $700,000 in equity from his mother’s home.
The proposal also includes 24/7 home confinement monitored by Arsec Group Security Services, with real-time alerts sent to law enforcement and the court.
Prosecutors claim the offer is insufficient, saying Lil Durk has used his wealth and influence to encourage violence.
They cited an affidavit from a separate case in Illinois, alleging he offered money for the murder of those linked to his brother’s death and even placed a bounty on a witness’s family member.
Still, Findling insists the accusations are flimsy and unrelated to the current charges.
The government also pointed to a jail violation involving Lil Durk, who used another inmate’s phone minutes. But Findling said the infraction was minor and not punished by prison staff.
“While Mr. Banks’ phone infractions did violate BOP policy, they appear to involve personal family communications rather than criminal activity,” Findling said. “Such violations commonly occur in prison facilities due to detainees’ desire to maintain family contact under restrictive communication limits.”
Prosecutors maintain that Lil Durk orchestrated the hit and that his release would pose a serious risk to the community.
He faces three federal charges: conspiracy, use of interstate facilities in a murder-for-hire resulting in death, and using and possessing firearms, including a machine gun, in a violent crime.
A judge has not yet ruled on the bond request.
