Vestax QFO: A Footnote Worth Remembering

There’s a particular type of DJ gear that occupies a curious space in our collective memory. Not quite a failure, not exactly a success, but something more interesting than either: a genuinely innovative piece of kit that simply arrived at the wrong moment, or perhaps asked too much of its intended audience. The Vestax QFO sits comfortably in this category, a piece of hardware that deserves more than the footnote it’s become.

Released in 2004, the QFO was born from a collaboration between Vestax and DJ Qbert, which should tell you everything about its intended purpose. This wasn’t a bit of kit designed for wedding DJs or club residents. It was purpose-built for turntablists, for the scratch community that had been pushing the boundaries of what you could do with vinyl and a crossfader since the late 1980s. Qbert’s involvement wasn’t just a branding exercise either. The design philosophy came directly from the needs and frustrations of working scratch DJs, particularly those who’d spent years moving between deck and mixer, wishing the two could somehow be closer together. The QFO’s answer was simple in concept, complex in execution: put them in the same unit. Make it a turntable that’s also a mixer, or a mixer that’s also a turntable, depending on how you want to look at it.

The core innovation here was about proximity. Every scratch DJ knows the dance: hand on the record, hand to the crossfader, hand back to the record, hand to the pitch control. It’s a physical conversation that happens dozens of times per minute, and every millimetre of distance adds up. The QFO addressed this by positioning the mixer controls around the platter itself. Faders, EQ controls, everything within immediate reach of wherever your hands happened to be. But the real talking point was the pitch control. Rather than the standard vertical slider tucked away on the front corner of a deck, the QFO featured a curved slider that wrapped 180 degrees around the platter. The theory was sound: you could manipulate the record with one hand whilst simultaneously adjusting pitch and hitting the quartz lock button, all in a single fluid movement. On a standard setup, you’d need hands the size of dinner plates to pull that off.

For scratch DJs working on stage or in tight spaces, there was another practical advantage. The QFO was genuinely portable. One unit, one flight case, minimal cabling. Compare that to hauling a pair of 1210s and a mixer around, and you can see the appeal. Particularly for touring DJs or those working in bands where space is already at a premium.

The original QFO wasn’t cheap. At launch, you were looking at around a grand, which put it firmly in serious-investment territory. Under the bonnet, though, it had the credentials. The motor came from Vestax’s PDX-2000 series, which had already proven itself reliable in the scratch community. The crossfader featured the kind of adjustability you’d expect from dedicated scratch mixers: reverse switching, curve control, sharp cut-in. There was even a rehearsal monitor mode, letting you practise without broadcasting your mistakes to the room. The build included features like replaceable PCV faders and a three-way monitor system. This was professional equipment designed for professional use, with the price tag to match.

By 2008, Vestax released the QFO LE, a “lite” version that addressed the most obvious criticism: the price. At £599, it was more accessible, though still hardly pocket money. The LE was limited to 250 units worldwide, which gives you some indication of how niche this market actually was. The cost reduction came from sensible compromises. The Active Balance tonearm was swapped for a standard ASTS straight tonearm, still perfectly capable for scratch work. The EQ section was removed entirely, which is perhaps the most questionable decision. Even a basic bass cut would have been useful for scratch DJs, but that was gone. The fader section was simplified too, with reverse and curve controls removed from the input faders, though the crossfader retained its core functionality. What remained was still a capable piece of kit. The innovative pitch control stayed, as did the fundamental concept of integrated design. For scratch DJs with a reasonable level of skill, it offered genuine creative possibilities that simply weren’t available on conventional setups.

Here’s where it gets interesting. By most conventional measures, the QFO should have been a success. It was well-built, genuinely innovative, backed by one of the biggest names in turntablism, and addressed real problems that working DJs faced. Yet it never achieved widespread adoption. Part of this was timing. By 2004, the scratch scene was already beginning to fragment. Serato had launched the year before, and whilst vinyl simulation wouldn’t kill turntablism, it fundamentally changed what many DJs needed from their hardware. The appeal of portability meant less when you could carry an entire record collection on a laptop.

There was also the learning curve. The QFO’s layout was intuitive once you got used to it, but that adjustment period was real. DJs who’d spent years developing muscle memory on traditional setups found themselves relearning basic movements. That 180-degree pitch control, whilst clever, felt alien to anyone accustomed to a vertical slider. Some DJs reported it took weeks before the benefits outweighed the awkwardness. Price remained a barrier throughout the QFO’s production run. Even the LE version cost more than a decent second-hand 1210 and mixer combination, and for DJs just starting out or working on tight budgets, that mattered. The integrated design meant if one component failed, the entire unit needed repair, unlike modular setups where you could swap out a broken mixer or deck independently.

Both the QFO and QFO LE are long out of production now. Vestax itself ceased trading in 2014, which makes sourcing parts or repairs increasingly difficult. You’ll occasionally see them appear on secondary markets, usually commanding prices that reflect their rarity rather than their practical utility. What’s interesting is who still talks about them. Serious turntablists, particularly those who owned one, tend to speak fondly of the QFO. Not as something perfect, but as something genuinely different. A piece of equipment that tried to solve real problems in new ways, even if the market wasn’t quite ready for the solution.

The QFO represents a particular moment in DJ technology, one where innovation sometimes ran ahead of practical adoption. It’s easy to look back and identify why it didn’t become the industry standard, but that misses the point slightly. Not every innovative product needs to dominate its market to be worthwhile. The questions the QFO asked remain relevant. How close together should our controls be? What compromises are we willing to accept for portability? When does integration make sense, and when does modularity serve us better? These aren’t questions with definitive answers, and they keep reappearing as technology evolves.

For working DJs in 2025, the QFO is more curiosity than practical option. Parts are scarce, repairs are complex, and most of what it offered can now be achieved in other ways. But for anyone interested in the evolution of DJ equipment, it deserves attention. It was a serious attempt to rethink the fundamental layout we’d taken for granted since the 1970s. Some innovations succeed immediately. Others plant seeds that grow into something else years later. And some, like the QFO, simply exist as proof that people were thinking hard about how to do things better, even if the market wasn’t quite ready to follow. That’s not a failure. That’s just how progress actually works.

If you ever spot one in decent condition for a reasonable price, it might be worth a closer look. Not as a practical workhorse, but as a reminder that innovation doesn’t always look like we expect it to. And sometimes, the most interesting gear is the stuff that nearly worked.

Related